Accounts receivable. Cash applied, disputes worked, DSO down.
Receivables age because the work is manual triage: matching payments to invoices, chasing short-pays, reconstructing what a customer actually owes across POs, credits, and disputes.
We deploy cash application that matches at the line-item level, dispute handling that assembles the full account story before anyone picks up the phone, and aging analysis that flags the invoices about to slip — grounded in the same Ontology your billing runs on.
Cash application that matches remits at the line-item level — short-pays, multi-PO payments, and credits included.
A dispute workbench that assembles the full account story — POs, credits, contact history — before anyone picks up the phone.
Aging radar: the invoices about to slip, flagged with a recommended next action instead of a row in a report.
The objects this use case reads and writes — stood up during the diagnostic, shared with every use case that follows.
This is a diagnostic candidate: two to three days on your floor, the relevant slice of the Ontology stood up from your data, and a working first pass you can judge in production terms — not a deck.
AI stopped
being a demo.
Nobody sent a memo.
Not sure where to start? Book a half-hour with an engineer who ships frontier AI weekly. You’ll leave knowing what’s possible and what’s still a demo.
with an engineer